The insistence on avoiding LIDAR sensors because they are "expensive" strikes me as not just wrong but mystifyingly, bizarrely wrong. How can a tech CEO, who has lived with Moore's law his entire life, who built an internet company on the backs of the falling cost of telecoms, who built a CAR company on the falling costs of batteries, who built (sort of) an energy company on the falling cost of solar panels, who is currently building a space company on the falling cost of rockets and launch...how can that same person look at a novel semiconductor-based technology product and say "It's no use building around this, it will remain prohibitively expensive forever"?
The insistence on avoiding LIDAR sensors because they are "expensive" strikes me as not just wrong but mystifyingly, bizarrely wrong. How can a tech CEO, who has lived with Moore's law his entire life, who built an internet company on the backs of the falling cost of telecoms, who built a CAR company on the falling costs of batteries, who built (sort of) an energy company on the falling cost of solar panels, who is currently building a space company on the falling cost of rockets and launch...how can that same person look at a novel semiconductor-based technology product and say "It's no use building around this, it will remain prohibitively expensive forever"?
Very informative! Thank you.
You're welcome!